Pure vs. Impure Improv

by Dr. Daniel J. Wiener

Hi Everyone,

Hope you’re all healthy and happy.  This week we are starting a series of guest blogs from our amazing stars of the film.  To make sure you get them all, sign up for the Act Social mailing list:  http://eepurl.com/dKff7k 

Today’s blog is from drama therapist and pioneer of the “Rehearsals for Growth” technique, Dr. Dan Wiener.     

“Pure” and “Impure” Improv

Daniel J. Wiener, PhD, RDT-BCT

In Rehearsals for Growth (RfG), we recognize that the dominant mode of adult mental functioning is “Survival Mind,” which focuses our attention purposefully toward the future in order to get desired results, scan for dangers, and promote the feeling of being in control of/ achieving success in that future. By contrast, “Adventure Mind” activity is present-centered, follows what is interesting and is absorbed in living fully for the moment. From the Survival Mind perspective, Adventure Mind, when manifest in adult behavior, is an infrequent (and sometimes risky) lapse into childishness. On the other hand, from the perspective of Adventure Mind, there is a joylessness in the sole pursuit of success at the expense of fully present experiencing.

Imagine someone striving for social prestige who first works to make the money to dine at the finest restaurant, then orders food chosen by what will impress others and, while eating, thinks only about how to describe his dining experience to those others at some later time. What this person has missed was the opportunity to enjoy the meal at the time of eating! Clearly, it is possible to do all the rest in Survival Mind AND switch over to Adventure Mind once the eating begins, yet the ingrained habits of Survival Mind may result in the diner pursuing the anticipated triumph of boasting to others to the detriment of fully tasting his food.

Confined to the context of the individual, improv may be thought of as an activity that draws both on Adventure Mind (for its absorption in the present moment) AND Survival Mind (both for its adherence to rules and being structured by an awareness of underlying purpose). Note that this blog will focus only on the mental/emotional process of the individual improviser; the complex topic of the parts played by Adventure and Survival Minds during interaction among improvisers will be addressed in future blogging. [Suffice it to say for now that improv can also be thought of from an interactionist (Social Constructivist) paradigm as a relational construction of meaning that cannot be reduced to individual psychological constructs].

The Relative “Impurity” of Stage Improv

So what are the differences between Stage and Therapeutic improvising with respect to their “purity” of Adventure Mind functioning?  Well, on closer examination, seldom do any of us ever engage in “pure” Adventure Mind improvising. While on-stage improvisers can experience the joy of spontaneity that lies at the core of Adventure Mind functioning, it should be recognized that most improv performances draw on Survival Mind functioning as well. The primary objective of stage improv performance is typically that of entertaining an audience, where both success or failure (internal as well as external) are at stake for the performers. The tendency to “steer for” audience admiration and/or laughter may corrupt the improvisers, who may fall back on repeating elements (of topics, plotting, characters or format) that worked in the past, thereby prioritizing success over playfulness and artistry. Well-wrought, authentic examples both of competitive and uninspired improv “corruption” are displayed in Mike Birbiglia’s wonderful 2016 film “Don’t Think Twice,” where an improv troupe’s supportive friendships are destroyed by externally-imposed competition for career survival.

My improv teacher, Keith Johnstone, repeatedly pointed out that scenes, when improvised with spontaneity, can be fascinating to an audience without having to be funny. He would sometimes call forth a “Boring Scene” to pre-empt the tendency of stage improvisers to “whore for laughs.”

While stage improvisers can learn to resist their overlearned Survival Mind tendencies, doing so runs counter to the strong pull of their current social and professional incentives. If your professional identity is closely linked to your career success as measured by acclaim from peers and/or job offers you will be strengthening these Survival Mind tendencies further. I make no moral judgment against doing so—we all need to make our way in this world, after all. But consider whether stage improvising is becoming a “job” rather than a “playdate” for you!

I believe that re-learning to awaken Adventure Mind will take a support network of fellow improvisers that commit to mutually exploring and practicing alternatives to the following examples of Survival Mind functioning: Being swayed by internalized standards of “competence;” Attaching importance to external signs of “success” in both rehearsals and performance; Striving for “originality” (“Dare to be Average” could be the counter-motto, here!)

As noted at the beginning of this blog, whether we are improvisers or non-improvisers, we are all trained to scan the future for opportunities and danger and to mobilize our efforts to steer for the best outcomes for ourselves. On the surface, the current, larger-world coronavirus-saturated environment tilts us all even further in the direction of heighted fear and vigilance HOWEVER, history teaches that real-world adversity, short of annihilation, does not dim or suppress the human spirit—humor, playfulness and expressed acts of imagination are not going to disappear!

The Relative “Purity” of Therapeutic Improv

I believe that therapeutic improv is closer to “pure” improv than is performance improv. By this I mean that a client who undertakes improv performing during a therapy session is less likely to be striving to impress others, even though inhibitory self-consciousness is nearly always present. Indeed, I have been impressed repeatedly by the openness and daring of so many clients who went into the unknown and courageously adventured into new territory by following their spontaneous impulses. To be sure, plenty of other clients “play it safe,” either refusing to commit to entering the playspace fully, breaking character during a Game, or blocking (often through “blanking out”) during an enactment. Such clients may merely be unconfident of their capacity to tolerate the uncertainty of having to forgo social routines and familiar ways of responding to the unexpected which often result in blocking the offer.

However, it should be remembered that improv in the therapeutic context is frequently experienced as an emotionally “high stakes” encounter for clients, given that the therapist often: (1) chooses specific games in order to “stretch” clients’ habitual boundaries; (2) deliberately offers less familiar roles; and (3) engineers scenarios that resonate with clients’ emotionally-sensitive issues (Proxy scenes). Moreover, stage improv is performed for strangers who have no knowledge of or interest in the private lives of the improvising actors, while enactments performed in therapy take place in the presence of therapists and sometimes family members who are far more alert to both the correspondences and discrepancies between the client’s performances and his/her habitual social behavior. Improvising clients thus face a more formidable audience than do stage improvisers in front of whom to display vulnerability.

By my estimate, roughly 2/3 of clients (individuals, couples or families) will, with appropriate timing, attempt improv at all; of these, about half will accept the offer to use improv in their therapy beyond their initial one or two experiences. This remaining 1/3 who go on to enact additional RfG Exercises and Games are not distinguishable by either the severity of their presenting problems or other obvious population demographics (other than for children, who are far more willing, and adolescents, who are considerably more wary). In my 34 yrs.’ clinical experience, clients who can access Adventure Mind in therapy make more rapid and durable progress. And the “Purity” of client improvising manifests in those fascinating moments during enactments when self-conscious censorship is absent.

Sign up for mailing list to get more blogs like this 

Dan Wiener’s NEW BOOK IS OUT!

Wiener, D. J. (2020). The Rehearsals for Growth Practitioner’s Manual (2nd. Edn). Northampton, MA: Advanced Psychotherapies Press.

Written for Mental Health professionals and students, this updated, greatly expanded 2nd Edition of The Rehearsals for Growth Practitioner Manual (first produced in 2014) is divided into two main parts. Section I, “How to Do It,” presents information, lessons from experience, concepts, and perspectives intended to supplement the user’s base of practical knowledge.

Section II, “RfG Training,” sets forth the requirements, activities, competencies, evaluation tools and assignments for The RfG Certified Practitioner (RfG-CP) Curriculum. This Manual supplements the author’s foundational text, Rehearsals for growth: Theater improvisation for psychotherapists.

Available from: https://www.rehearsalsforgrowth.com/publications/books-by-daniel-j-wiener-ph-d/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *